Volume 9

~ News From "Your Birthing Family" ~

Issue 10

 

_______________________________________________

 

   

Charis Around the World

Tidbits from Ebony

by Elizabeth Carmichael


Sunset in Ebony

Dear Charis Family,

Greetings from Candybar!  My favorite place to be.  It has been an awesome trip this time and I have been astounded at the opportunities to become re-aquainted with people I knew years ago.  I ran into one midwife I had interviewed SEVEN years ago who was slaving away in the local hospital here, barely seeing any dent in maternal health care problems which plague this country.  I also ran into a dear lady who previously worked for me.  She was a tailor on a handicraft small business project, but now she is a health assistant benefiting internally displaced people.  He has a way of leaving the aroma of Jesus in very tangible ways for people.  These interactions have helped me feel encouraged to ask for the places I am setting my feet this week.  I encourage YOU to “walk the map” and set your feet spiritually around the globe, asking for those people to know Him.  It feels like such a mess these days, doesn’t it???

I wanted to share with you a bit I wrote this week about leadership and influence.  I led a discussion amongst my co-workers here where we analyzed who is influential within the team and why.  I then reflected on that a bit for my own role and context.  The book I was reading, which I cite in the piece, is really excellent and current.  I highly recommend it.

How are YOU structuring the groups or organizational units you work within?  Who are you influencing and how?  Is it the most effective way to influence someone? Does it leave lasting impact?  Who are you being challenged to receive influence from?  What can you share with them about your own values that will help them influence you in more helpful ways?

Enjoy reading a bit about my team of Pushpin people that I work with!!
Until next time,
Elizabeth Carmichael


چي دستار تړي هزار دي
د دستار سړي په شمار دي


Those who tie a turban are in thousands.

Those who understand its responsibility are only a few.


This week I am with a team I admire and learn so much from, in terms of what type of group dynamics and Kingdom values are possible among non-believing (yet!) people from one of the most conservative, violent cultural traditions and largest tribal society (from one ethno-linguistic group) that exists in our generation.  This is the team of people/the project I do all my work for and advise from far away in the capital.  Usually, I spend time with them face to face once a month, but this year, because of security constraints, I have not been able to see them since February, before the presidential election process started.  I am so thankful to be here this week and to have the opportunity to initiate this discussion among them.

During a project evaluation last year, the evaluator took some time to study the organizational chart on the wall of our office here in Candybar.  Since the massive chart, with many boxes and lines, depicts only the relationship of upper management and HQ key positions, he exclaimed, “Oh great! A huge chart on the wall to remind this entire office that their jobs are not important enough to be on the chart!”  He is exactly right.  Within the organization as a whole, this project is mostly significant because of the high profile location of our work.  No staff member here holds any position of hierarchical significance at a national level, including me, except for the fact that I am an expat advisor.  Even though the power distance between this project and our HQ is so great, the staff here (18 in all) insist upon functioning by consensus and collaboration.  They have been working on this dynamic for nine years and it actually astounds me every time I come face to face with it.  Through my discussion with them, I learned more about this phenomenon.  The project manager kept saying, “Distance is bad.”  He spoke about choices they make as a team to close the gap between themselves and their beneficiaries as well as his personal views on associating with staff members who are in the “lowest” positions: “Why I should not sit with the doorkeeper?  Why he should not tell me his idea?”  This reminded me of something I read recently: “While followers by definition lack authority, at least in relation to their superiors, they do not by definition lack power and influence” (Kellerman, 2008).

As you can imagine, this manager’s subordinates noted his influence on the organization as one of those who is most open to being influenced by anyone who buys into the vision and core values of the group.  Everyone in the room named about two or three people who also have a positive impact on their work.  They spent time encouraging each other with their words.  But, what stood out to me the most were the following issues:

     Some were credited with having the most influence, overall, on the team/project are people who are no longer with the project because they either died or have moved out of the organization.  (It is very common in this culture to speak most highly of someone when they are no longer in one’s everyday life, so this point did not surprise me.)

     Some were credited with influence, but the real and deeper aspects of their influence were only mentioned in private. (When the team leader went to the bathroom, one of the women said to me, “There is really no one in the world like him. When I was all alone in my problem, he helped me find a solution.”  Likewise, when other people were out of the room, the leader would praise them more than he would in front of them.)

     The conversation eventually turned to those who have had a negative influence on the team and how their gradual departure from team culture became unbearable for them as individuals and for the team.  They had both become more conservative and aligned themselves with armed opposition groups, desiring to bring an element of oppression and an ideology to the office that the team would not accept.  One of them resigned (high position, high salary) and the other was let go (low position, low salary).

     The discussion never turned to those whose influence is positive, yet not obvious.  Several team members really “get it” (understand and embrace the team values and culture) and their contribution is self-sacrificial, yet these people were not mentioned as having key influence.  One reason could be that no one in the room for our discussion experienced a personal benefit from the people I have in mind.  However, I am not sure that is a fair assumption to make about the reason they were not mentioned.

     Since I’ve been working on the budget for the past week, I couldn’t help but reflect on the salary grade of the people named as “influential” verses those who were not.  The highest paid person and all women were not mentioned as influential. Two mid-grade people and the lowest paid people were mentioned as influential for various reasons.


In terms of the type of help the leader found most meaningful, he is currently most helped by staff members who benefit him in a personal way.  This is not to say his willingness to be helped or influenced is all for personal gain, but, rather, that he is impacted at a heart level.  I am sure this has something to do with a personal crisis he has been dealing with for a number of months, which has left him somewhat traumatized and distracted as he seeks to resolve the issue.  During our discussion, I realized that he has received some significant personal, outside-of-work, help recently from his staff and this has meant the world to him.  But, he has also started to view nearly all of their contributions as personal in nature, which has made him both notice their contributions more and express gratitude for those contributions.  He has had a place of need recently and they have filled that need without judgment or expectation of reciprocity.  Therefore, he is more able to see when people are rising above their own challenges and acting for the collective good of the team or the project.  I was honored today to hear him articulate this in their presence.

True followership “does not mean changing the rank of followers but changing their response to their rank, their response to their superiors and to the situation at hand” (Kellerman, 2008).  This team has some excellent followership, in my opinion, and these are some points I will take away as a positional leader in service to them:

     Since developing good followers is as important as developing good leaders, I have realized I need to advocate for the example this group is and encourage “followership” standards as an equally high priority for community development indicators as establishment and training of leaders.

     Because, as Kellerman points out, rank ordering does really have an impact on well being, I believe the women of our organization are not being influenced as positively as they could be nor vice versa (2008).  The team is weaker for the segregation of the female staff, but culture is such a powerful dictator even when there are opportunities to “try on” something else.  This needs to be an ongoing discussion amongst this team and I need to seize the chance to speak up a bit more, challenging them to go deeper in their value of inclusion.

     According to Kellerman, it might be helpful for the women of the team (since they can not change their rank and, in many ways, can not change their role in society right now—this is so complicated right now in Pashtun culture…I am not going to go into it here) they should have growing demands and higher expectations.  As a team, we need to spend more energy and focus on developing follower ideas and standards for the organization, as well as giving ear to their voice in decision making (2008).

Kellerman, B. (2008). Followership: How Followers are Creating Change and Changing Leaders.  Harvard Business Press.

 

 Our International Charis Family
Your stories from around the world touch us and we pray for your safety.
Thanks, Love and Blessings to every one of you!


 
'Behold, I will bring them from the north country, And gather them from the ends of the earth,
 Among  them the blind and the lame, The woman with child and The one who labors with child,  together,
 A great throng shall return there...And My people shall be satisfied with My goodness, says the LORD.'
 Jeremiah 31:8, 14
~~~
©2014 Charis Childbirth Services, All Rights Reserved
Feel free to forward this newsletter to friends in its entirety, leaving all attribution intact.
October 2014